The Benghazi Conspiracy: Unraveling the Alleged Stinger Missile Cover-Up

Introduction: A Political Firestorm That Won’t Die

The 2012 Benghazi attack remains one of the most controversial events in modern U.S. political history, fueling debates, investigations, and, as a recent X post suggests, explosive conspiracy theories. On May 30, 2025, a user named@RickyDoggin

reignited the conversation with a viral post claiming that the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was part of a covert operation to recover illegally supplied Stinger missiles—a mission allegedly orchestrated by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama. The post, which has since garnered significant attention, accuses the Obama administration of treason, blackmail, and a cover-up involving everything from a private email server to the Bowe Bergdahl prisoner swap. But how much of this holds up under scrutiny? Let’s dive into the claims, the evidence, and the lingering questions surrounding Benghazi.

The Allegation: Stinger Missiles, Treason, and a Deadly Cover-Up@RickyDoggin

’s post paints a chilling picture: Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve U.S.-made Stinger missiles that the State Department had allegedly supplied to Ansar al-Sharia, a Libyan militia, without Congressional oversight. These missiles, the post claims, ended up in Afghanistan, where one was used to down a U.S. Chinook helicopter in July 2012. The serial number traced back to a CIA cache in Qatar, allegedly exposing the State Department’s illicit arms deal. To cover this up, Stevens was sent on a “do-or-die” mission, stand-down orders were issued during the Benghazi attack, and the Obama administration blamed a YouTube video for the violence. The post also ties in the 2014 Bowe Bergdahl-Taliban prisoner swap, suggesting it was a response to Taliban blackmail over the missile deal.

The image accompanying the post features Hillary Clinton at a United Nations event, with the caption: “Forward this again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.” Replies to the post amplify the outrage, with users calling Clinton “the most corrupt woman to ever serve in U.S. government” and demanding accountability for alleged treason.

Digging Into the Claims: What’s Fact, What’s Fiction?

Let’s break down the key allegations and examine them against available evidence.

1. The Stinger Missile Deal
The claim that the State Department supplied Stinger missiles to Ansar al-Sharia lacks direct evidence. Stinger missiles are highly controlled U.S. weapons, and their distribution is typically overseen by the Department of Defense or CIA, not the State Department. While it’s true that the U.S. supported Libyan rebels during the 2011 overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi, there’s no declassified evidence confirming that Stinger missiles were provided to Ansar al-Sharia, a group later designated as a terrorist organization. A 2012 incident involving a downed Chinook helicopter in Afghanistan was reported, but official investigations attributed the attack to RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades), not Stinger missiles. The serial number story remains unverified by credible sources.

2. The Benghazi Attack and Stand-Down Orders
The Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012, resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Stevens, diplomat [The attack was carried out by Ansar al-Sharia, as confirmed by U.S. and Libyan officials. Multiple investigations, including by the House Select Committee on Benghazi, found security failures but no evidence of a deliberate stand-down order. The Pentagon did deploy a drone for surveillance, and Secretary Clinton coordinated with CIA Director David Petraeus during the attack, according to Wikipedia. However, claims of a “do-or-die” mission to recover missiles are speculative and unsupported by official reports.

3. The YouTube Video Narrative
The Obama administration initially linked the attack to protests over a YouTube video, “Innocence of Muslims,” which had sparked outrage across the Middle East. Clinton later clarified that the attack was not directly tied to the video, a statement supported by intelligence reports at the time. Kenneth R. Timmerman’s book, Deception: The Making of the YouTube Video Hillary and Obama Blamed for Benghazi, argues the video narrative was a deliberate distraction, but this remains a theory, not a proven fact.

4. The Bowe Bergdahl Swap
The 2014 exchange of Bowe Bergdahl for five Taliban detainees was controversial, with some in Congress accusing the Obama administration of negotiating with terrorists. However, negotiations began in 2010, well before the Benghazi attack, as reported by Ballotpedia. There’s no documented link between the swap and alleged Taliban blackmail over Stinger missiles.

5. Clinton’s Private Server and Alleged Treason
Clinton’s use of a private email server was heavily scrutinized, with the FBI concluding there was no criminal intent. The accusation of treason—a crime requiring intent to betray the U.S.—is a serious one, but no evidence has emerged to support this charge against Clinton or Obama in relation to Benghazi.

Why This Conspiracy Resonates

The Benghazi conspiracy endures because it taps into broader distrust of political elites. The attack occurred during the 2012 presidential election, and Republicans heavily criticized the Obama administration’s response. Clinton’s “What difference does it make?” comment during a 2013 hearing—highlighted in a reply to@RickyDoggin’s post—became a rallying cry for critics. The lack of definitive answers about the attack’s origins, combined with the emotional weight of losing American lives, has kept the story alive. Social media platforms like X amplify these narratives, as seen in the heated replies to the post, which include memes, calls for justice, and references to Clinton as a “killer, liar, traitor, and thief.”

The Bigger Picture: Truth vs. Narrative

The Benghazi saga illustrates the power of narrative in shaping public perception. Official investigations have debunked many conspiracy theories, yet they persist because they offer a simple explanation for a complex tragedy: a grand cover-up by corrupt leaders. This resonates with audiences who feel alienated by government opacity. However, the lack of concrete evidence for@RickyDoggin’s claims suggests that while there may have been failures in Benghazi, the idea of a treasonous missile deal and blackmail plot may be more fiction than fact.

Conclusion: What Do You Think?

The Benghazi conspiracy continues to captivate and divide. While@RickyDoggin’s post raises serious allegations, much of it remains unproven, relying on speculation rather than evidence. Yet the persistence of these claims reflects a deeper yearning for accountability and truth in a polarized era. As we reflect on this chapter of history, a few questions linger:

• Do you believe there’s more to the Benghazi story than official reports have revealed?

• How much responsibility should leaders like Hillary Clinton bear for security failures abroad?

• In an age of viral conspiracies, how can we separate fact from fiction while honoring the memory of those lost?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below, and stay tuned to boncopia.com for more deep dives into the stories that shape our world.