Is AG Pam Bondi Really Charging Alejandro Mayorkas with Treason? Unpacking the Controversy

A Viral Claim Sparks Debate

On May 30, 2025, an X post by user JOSH DUNLAP (@JDunlap1974

) sent shockwaves through social media: “ AG Pam Bondi is reportedly poised to charge Alejandro Mayorkas with treason for deliberately allowing 20 million illegals to flood our nation, a disgraceful betrayal that undermines America’s sovereignty.” Accompanied by a photo of Attorney General Pam Bondi standing in front of U.S. and Department of Justice flags, the post quickly gained traction, racking up replies ranging from skepticism to outright frustration. But how much truth is behind this explosive claim? Let’s dive into the details and separate fact from fiction.

The Context: Who Are Pam Bondi and Alejandro Mayorkas?

Pam Bondi, the current U.S. Attorney General as of 2025, is no stranger to controversy. A former Florida AG and a key figure in Donald Trump’s legal team during his 2020 impeachment trial, Bondi has been accused of turning the Department of Justice into a tool for political agendas, as reported by The Guardian on May 2, 2025. Critics, including former DOJ prosecutor Mike Romano, argue that her actions—like establishing a “weaponization working group” to challenge investigations into Trump—prioritize loyalty to the president over the rule of law.

Alejandro Mayorkas, on the other hand, served as the Secretary of Homeland Security under the Biden administration until early 2025. His tenure was marked by intense scrutiny from Republicans over border security policies. In February 2024, the House voted to impeach Mayorkas, accusing him of failing to enforce immigration laws—a move PBS News described as a symbolic Republican push that lacked bipartisan support and ultimately stalled in the Senate.

The Treason Allegation: Does It Hold Up?

The X post claims Mayorkas allowed “20 million illegals” to enter the U.S., framing it as treason. But let’s break this down. First, the number “20 million” is a figure often cited by conservative outlets but lacks verification from credible sources like the U.S. Census Bureau or DHS. A 2023 Pew Research estimate pegged the undocumented immigrant population at around 11 million, a number that hasn’t seen such a drastic spike in official reports.

More importantly, does this accusation meet the legal definition of treason? According to Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, treason involves either “levying war” against the United States or “adhering to [its] enemies, giving them aid and comfort.” As the National Constitution Center notes, this is a deliberately narrow definition, designed to prevent governments from weaponizing treason charges against political opponents. Historically, treason convictions are rare—only one person has been indicted for treason since 1954, per the Constitution Center.

Mayorkas’ immigration policies, even if criticized, don’t fit this mold. The 2024 impeachment articles against him, which focused on “willful refusal” to enforce immigration laws, were widely seen as a policy dispute, not a criminal act rising to “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Legal experts, including conservative scholars cited by PBS News, dismissed those charges as unwarranted. Treason, a far more serious accusation, requires clear intent to betray the nation to its enemies—something immigration policy disagreements, even severe ones, simply don’t constitute under precedents like Cramer v. United States (1945).

The Social Media Reaction: Skepticism and Frustration

The X thread reveals a divided audience. Some users, like@TheDaddyTw.ne, urged action over talk, posting a cartoon of a door labeled “Office of Attorney General Pam Bondi” with a “Gone Foxing” sign—a jab at Bondi’s frequent Fox News appearances. Others, like@JCH0718, mocked the claim with an image of Bondi holding a sign reading “Nobody Will Ever Be Arrested,” reflecting a broader sentiment that such announcements are all bluster.@ElkslayerH9echoed this frustration, adding a meme of Bondi with the caption, “I’m not a real Attorney General, but I play one on TV.”

A few users, such as@mooseygalore, pointed out that this story isn’t new—it first surfaced on May 19, 2025, via Trends Newsline, suggesting the claim has been recirculating without concrete developments. Others, like@eazamora92and@RealKSridharan, labeled it “fake news,” warning that such posts risk alienating “real MAGA folks” by spreading unverified claims.

The Bigger Picture: Immigration and Political Theater

This controversy taps into a larger debate about immigration and national sovereignty that has simmered for years. Republicans have long accused Democrats of lax border policies, with Mayorkas becoming a lightning rod during Biden’s presidency. The 2024 impeachment effort, led by figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, was less about legal accountability and more about political messaging, as PBS News reported. Now, with Bondi at the helm of the DOJ, critics fear her actions—like targeting political foes or pushing a hardline immigration agenda—reflect a politicized justice system, as The Guardian highlighted.

But without an official DOJ statement or legal filing as of May 30, 2025, the treason charge remains speculative. The lack of action has fueled skepticism, with users like@TBircks pleading, “Pam, stop being ‘poised’ and do something!” Yet, given the legal hurdles and historical precedent, it’s unlikely such a charge would materialize—or hold up in court.

Why This Matters to You

This story isn’t just about one X post—it’s about the power of social media to amplify unverified claims and the real-world implications of political rhetoric. Immigration remains a deeply divisive issue, and accusations like these can inflame tensions, shape public perception, and influence policy debates. For readers of Boncopia.com, understanding the facts behind the headlines is crucial to navigating today’s polarized landscape.

What’s Next?

As of now, there’s no evidence that Bondi has filed charges against Mayorkas. The claim, while attention-grabbing, appears to be more political theater than legal reality. But it raises broader questions about accountability, the role of the DOJ, and how we address immigration challenges in 2025 and beyond.

Let’s Discuss

• Do you think immigration policy disputes should ever be framed as criminal acts like treason, or are they better addressed through legislation and debate?

• How can we balance border security with humanitarian concerns in today’s political climate?

• What role does social media play in shaping your views on issues like this—does it clarify or confuse the conversation?

We’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments below! Stay tuned to Boncopia.com for more updates on this unfolding story.